Saturday, March 29, 2008

SEC Openly Invites Corporations To Lie

The Securities and Exchange Commission sent out a Letter On Fair Value Measurements, (Financial Accounting Standards No. 157) that is tantamount to being an open invitation to lie. Let's take a look at what some are saying about that letter.

Floyd Norris at the New York Times writes If Market Prices Are Too Low, Ignore Them.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is out today with a letter to companies that own a lot of financial instruments whose current market value must be reported to shareholders. For more than a few companies, disclosing market values is neither easy nor convenient.

The issue is the application of SFAS 157, which governs the way companies compute fair value of assets. The rule sets out three categories of assets, with different ways to value them. Category 1 includes assets with easily observable market values. I.B.M. stock closed today at $114.57, and it is not easy to justify a different value if your quarter ended today. Category 2 is a little fuzzier, where there are observable markets that provide a good guide to prices of your asset, even though there is no direct market. And then there is Category 3, which is essentially mark to model.

But one part of the letter stood out to me, providing an excuse for companies to ignore a market value if they don�t like it (italics added):

�Under SFAS 157, it is appropriate for you to consider actual market prices, or observable inputs, even when the market is less liquid than historical market volumes, unless those prices are the result of a forced liquidation or distress sale. Only when actual market prices, or relevant observable inputs, are not available is it appropriate for you to use unobservable inputs which reflect your assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.�

That sounds to me like an invitation to fudge. Some people on Wall Street think that nearly every sale today is a forced sale. There are entire categories of collateralized debt obligations where most, if not all, of the trades, occur because a holder has received, or expects, a margin call.
Naked Capitalism wrote an excellent piece on this today called SEC Gives Permission to Fudge Mark-to-Market.
In the last couple of months, there has been increased worry that mark-to-market accounting leads to the operation of a destructive "financial accelerator." As prevailing values go down, banks have to lower the value of their holdings. This leads to a direct hit to their net worth, which will lead them to contract their balance sheets, either by withholding credit or selling assets. More sales in a weak market lead to further declines in the prices of financial instruments, leading to more writedowns and sales of inventory.

Funny how no one had a problem with mark-to-market when asset prices were rising.

But now the SEC has given banks and brokers a huge out. No matter how small or easily absorbed by the market a forced sale might be (think of a hedge fund hit by a margin call), a financial institution can ignore the price realized. In fact, they get to determine what trades constitute a forced sale.

Moreover, we've seen plenty of unintended consequences, or worse, backfires, as regulators intervene trying to alleviate the credit crisis. Banks have been reluctant to extend credit to each other precisely because they don't trust their creditworthiness. That's tantamount to saying they already don't trust their public financial statements, since according to their public filings, virtually all major financial institutions have more than the required statutory capital.

So this move, to stem the balance-sheet-shrinking impact of mark-to-market accounting in a falling price environment, may further undermine liquidity. Companies will less able to judge whether their published financials are telling the whole story, And where the numbers are in doubt, rumors are taken more seriously.

To paraphrase Winston Churchill, it has been said that mark to market accounting is the worst form of financial accounting except for all the others that have been tried. But it looks like we are going to try them anyhow.
Let's sum this all up. Corporations were happy to mark to market as long as asset prices were going up. This led to more loans on top of loans as corporations were making huge profits, at least on paper. Enormous bonuses were handed out based on those paper profits and corporations leveraged up loans.

Now we see those profits were nothing but a mirage.

Of course everyone knew those earnings were a mirage even at the time, but as long as the party was going on, no one wanted to spoil it, especially the Fed and the SEC. So the SEC looked away, and so did the Fed, and so did investors who were happy with everything as long as stock prices were going up.

In the asymmetrical world of the Fed and the SEC bubbles are never prevented, but everything is done to prevent them from busting. Now the SEC is openly inviting corporation to lie.

Disclosure that was fine on the way up is somehow not fine on the way down.

In the end all this does is create more mistrust and suspicion about what is real and what is imaginary. That suspicion may be more damaging than actual disclosure and may also create big temporary inequities between corporations that decide to come clean vs. those who keep sneaking more garbage into Category 3 assets, while pretending those assets are worth more than they are.

Nonetheless, if there was a futures market on pretending, "pretending futures" would be a screaming buy. To paraphrase Martha Stewart "That's not a good thing".

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here
To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

Canon - Possible Camera Shake Correction Japan releases April 3

The ability to recruit slim Canon camera shake correction �95 IXY DIGITAL IS� launch in the Japanese market on April 3.


This product is three times the 10 million pixel CCD sensor and an optical sensitivity of ISO 1600 jumrenjeureul equipped with digital cameras, the best possible support, and even the speed of 30 frames per second is possible with a video camera. In addition, 230,000-pixel LCD screen, 3 inches, and SD memory card slots mounted Jobs said. 91.6 * 20.9 * 56.8mm size, weight 130g. [aving]


Consumer prices are expected 42,000 yen (approximately 417,000 won Hanwha).


Canon - Possible Camera Shake Correction Japan releases April 3


Canon - Possible Camera Shake Correction Japan releases April 3

Demonstration Version of Phocus Now Released

While the software is still in its Beta-testing stage, we are convinced that after spending just a brief time to get acquainted with Phocus, you will quickly come to appreciate its ease of use, modern look and feel, and impressive Phocus functionality. As with our camera system design, we have done everything in our power to engineer a product that will help you get the most from you photography and position you favorably against your competition.

A few Phocus highlights to pay particular attention to:
- The unsurpassed quality of the processed images, including corrections for DAC, Color, and Moir�.
- The "What you see is what you get" quality of the Viewer images, matching what you will see in Photoshop.
- The powerful camera controls, including new tools for remote focusing during tethered operation.
- The amazing workflow flexibility based upon the multitude of GUI layout options.
- The innovative use of the extensive Metadata, which includes full IPTC Core and GPS coordinates from Hasselblad Global Image Locator that linkdirectly into Google Earth.
- Other leading edge technology, including new a Moir� filter that works directly on the raw image data.

We are proud to be able to launch this exciting addition to the Hasselblad family and eager for photographers to get their hands on the software. Once again, this is the Demonstration Version of Phocus, not a final release version, and as such, certain minor bugs or issues may stil be present. Please check the read-me file for specific details concerning bugs or known issues.
Best regards and happy shooting!


Peter Stig-Nielsen
Hasselblad Product Management

source : hasselblad

Demonstration Version of Phocus Now Released

While the software is still in its Beta-testing stage, we are convinced that after spending just a brief time to get acquainted with Phocus, you will quickly come to appreciate its ease of use, modern look and feel, and impressive Phocus functionality. As with our camera system design, we have done everything in our power to engineer a product that will help you get the most from you photography and position you favorably against your competition.

A few Phocus highlights to pay particular attention to:
- The unsurpassed quality of the processed images, including corrections for DAC, Color, and Moir�.
- The "What you see is what you get" quality of the Viewer images, matching what you will see in Photoshop.
- The powerful camera controls, including new tools for remote focusing during tethered operation.
- The amazing workflow flexibility based upon the multitude of GUI layout options.
- The innovative use of the extensive Metadata, which includes full IPTC Core and GPS coordinates from Hasselblad Global Image Locator that linkdirectly into Google Earth.
- Other leading edge technology, including new a Moir� filter that works directly on the raw image data.

We are proud to be able to launch this exciting addition to the Hasselblad family and eager for photographers to get their hands on the software. Once again, this is the Demonstration Version of Phocus, not a final release version, and as such, certain minor bugs or issues may stil be present. Please check the read-me file for specific details concerning bugs or known issues.
Best regards and happy shooting!


Peter Stig-Nielsen
Hasselblad Product Management

source : hasselblad

AIPTEK launching Z300 HD-V palm-sized HD camcorder

AIPTEK launching Z300 HD-V palm-sized HD camcorder

aiptek_Z300HD_camcorder.jpg


AIPTEK has announced its new Z300 HD-V palm-sized camcorder, offering high definition recording on a budget.

It can record in 720p format (1,280 x 720 resolution) at up to 30 frames per second, and can take up to a 32GB SDHC card for storing the footage...

(Via Tech Digest.)

AIPTEK launching Z300 HD-V palm-sized HD camcorder

AIPTEK launching Z300 HD-V palm-sized HD camcorder

aiptek_Z300HD_camcorder.jpg


AIPTEK has announced its new Z300 HD-V palm-sized camcorder, offering high definition recording on a budget.

It can record in 720p format (1,280 x 720 resolution) at up to 30 frames per second, and can take up to a 32GB SDHC card for storing the footage...

(Via Tech Digest.)

ABCP Catch 22 In Canada

The asset backed commercial story in Canada takes a new twist every few weeks. I last wrote about the crisis on March 1, 2008 in Bank of Montreal Misses Margin Calls.

A short synopsis is that Canadian investors thought they were buying short term high quality commercial paper were actually buying subprime mortgage garbage from the US. In a complicated sets of twists and turns, the paper has been frozen since last August, as the value of the paper plummeted.

Bailout plan after bailout plan missed deadlines. All of the bailout plans have revolved around converting short term paper to long term paper, and even then with a loss. The amount frozen is approximately $33 billion. Following is a report on just one piece of the frozen debt.

On March 20, the Vancouver Sun reported Investors face a Catch-22 on ABCP.
Investors in British Columbia who put their money - and faith - in a Vancouver brokerage house, are now caught up in a financial nightmare. Canaccord Capital Inc. put about 1,400 clients, many of them from B.C., in ill-fated asset-backed commercial paper. Those investors, and their almost $270 million worth of savings, have been stuck in a legal limbo since the paper was frozen last August.

And now with a proposal to resolve the ABCP freeze expected to be sent to note-holders next month, the investors are faced with a Catch-22.

Under the plan, reached March 17, the short-term paper would be converted into new notes maturing as late as 2017. Once trading resumes, the new notes will likely trade at 60 cents to 80 cents on the dollar, according to analysts. For that discount, investors may have to give up the right to sue the banks, rating agencies and investment dealers who got them into the mess in the first place.

Or they could hold what were supposed to be short-term investments for eight years and hope to regain the full amount of their investment at that time.

The alternative is to vote against the plan, see the value of the notes drop even further, yet retain the right to spend thousands of dollars in legal fees, and years in court, to try to get their money back.

It's a lose-lose situation for investors who thought they were in risk-free, conservative investments.
The interesting twist is that the plan requires voter approval and it's one vote per person affected. The Sun notes that "retail investors hold only a small portion of the total amount in jeopardy, they outnumber the approximately 100 institutional investors at least 15 to one."

I can't help but laugh at this: "Last week, Canaccord hired an ABCP expert to advise its clients on the proposal."

Gee... Any idea what that "expert" is going to say? I think I do, and here it is with my translation as to the real meaning at the same time.

Expert Statement: "We recommend taking this deal as a fair and honest solution. It's the best we can do under the circumstances and it's time to put this behind us and move forward."

Translation: "You are damned if you do and damned if you don't. Either way you are damned. However, we recommend you take this deal right away because it protects us from further liability. Please sign on the dotted line now and we will throw in a free toaster."

Question: Why is Canaccord hiring an ABCP expert now instead of before investing in this stupid scheme?

Answer: They had no idea what they were doing then. They know full well what they are doing now... trying to protect their own hide. So they hired an expert that is all but guaranteed to give the answer they want to hear.

Coastal Community Credit Union Woes

On March 22 the Vancouver Sun wrote about Worried Investors at Coastal Community Credit Union.
Baumel, of Qualicum Beach, is one of an unknown number of credit union members across Canada who were put into ill-fated asset-back commercial paper through Credential Securities Inc., the credit unions' investment dealer. Yet now that the paper has gone bad, Baumel said the credit union is not willing to give him his money back.

Baumel is in real estate, so he has enough risky investments. That's why he wanted his savings to be in something 100-per-cent safe. At first it was in an account at the credit union, but that earned no interest, so the credit union -- Coastal Community Credit Union -- advised him to go to Credential. There he put his money in what he believed was a high-interest savings account.

But when Baumel went to withdraw $100,000 of his $365,000 portfolio last August to lend to a colleague as part of a business deal, he was given the bad news -- the money had been frozen.

Baumel had never heard of commercial paper, but if he had been told he was in asset-backed or mortgage-backed investments, he says he would have turned it down. He already had enough exposure to that risk with his real estate investments, Baumel said.

What makes Baumel "profoundly disappointed" is that despite the fact he told Credential to invest in something that was 100-per-cent safe, he ended up with ABCPs. And the credit union has refused to assure him he won't be out of pocket when the issue is resolved, Baumel said.

Other than Credential, Canaccord is the only investment dealer known to have not yet made a deal to indemnify its clients. While it is unknown how much Credential customers hold, Baumel was told that his credit union has about 12 clients in his situation, with a total of between $2 million to $3 million invested.
New Plan For Small ABCP holders

On March 28 Reuters reported Plan in works to help small Canadian ABCP holders.
A relief plan to assist individual owners of frozen Canadian asset-backed commercial paper is in the works, but it is moving more slowly than participants hoped, Canaccord Capital Inc Chief Operating Officer Mark Maybank said Friday.

"A lot of people are working very diligently ... we continue to work with others to put together that plan," Maybank said in an interview. "It's not finished, it's certainly taking longer than we or anyone else would like, but we think we're getting closer."

Some retail investors are upset with a proposal to restructure C$32 billion ($31.4 billion) of asset-backed notes that were issued by various non-bank-sponsored trusts. This segment of the commercial paper market collapsed last summer.

Retail noteholders, most of them Canaccord clients, outnumber institutional investors with big holdings, so they could kill the seven-month-long ABCP restructuring effort next month if a majority votes against the proposal.

The relief plan could offer extra liquidity to small ABCP investors who receive new, restructured notes. But it is "doubtful" the plan will be finalized before public information meetings on the main restructuring proposal begin next week, Maybank said. He declined to name the other parties in the talks. The Globe and Mail newspaper said "a group of Canadian financial institutions" was involved.

Small investors face tough choices as they ponder the restructuring proposal: receive new notes and wait years to recover their funds; sell the new notes at potentially steep discounts in a secondary market; or vote against it and try to recover their money through litigation.

Some 1,400 of an estimated 1,800 retail noteholders are clients of Canaccord. The investment dealer has said it cannot afford to buy out their ABCP positions, totaling about C$270 million.

Another 335 investors, who are with Credential Securities Inc., an investment dealer for various Canadian credit unions, collectively own C$48 million of the seized-up paper.

Credential said this week that it is exploring avenues to ensure that its investors "receive the maximum possible value from their investments." One option under discussion calls for retail investors' holdings to be bought for a set percentage of their initial investments.

"It depends a bit on the type and nature of the client, different clients have different needs, but we would be able to guarantee a certain percentage," Canaccord's Maybank said. "That would certainly be one of our preferred ways to go forward."

The cost of settling with individual ABCP investors is low in the grand scheme of the restructuring, so large stakeholders will probably step up, a bank analyst said Thursday. "We believe that small investors have less than C$500 million of the total balance but the majority of the votes," BMO Capital Markets analyst Ian de Verteuil said in a research note.

Assuming that a successful ABCP restructuring allowed 85 percent recovery on the paper, the cost of settling with small investors would only be C$75 million, de Verteuil said."We have no idea who will bear the costs of settling this situation but are confident that some of the larger stakeholders will," the analyst wrote.
Canaccord promises to make a deal with angry investors

On March 28 Canaccord promises to make a deal with angry investors.
Canaccord Capital Corp. said it's willing to come to an agreement with clients who were told the asset-backed commercial paper they bought was guaranteed. And for any other clients, the Vancouver brokerage is trying to set up a pool of funds that will enable investors to sell their notes at a set price.

Canaccord has 1,400 clients who have invested almost $270 million in the ABCPs. Last week a number of those clients complained to The Vancouver Sun that they had been sold the investments as equivalent to guaranteed investment certificates.

Mark Maybank, Canaccord's chief operating officer, said to suggest the notes were sold as GICs was "patently untrue."

"It's a higher yielding money market product," he said. "It does not have the word 'guaranteed' in it."

But if clients were told it was a guaranteed investment then that's a breach of the rules governing brokerage houses and Canaccord is willing to talk about possible remedies with them, he said.

Ron Lawley, a 72-year-old retiree from Nanaimo, has more than $200,000 tied up, which he says he told his broker to put into Canadian treasury bills. He's been writing and telephoning Canaccord compliance since December, without any resolution to date, though he remains hopeful.

But he won't take anything less than all his money back plus interest, he said.
"And if I don't get that, I am definitely going to be voting no on this accord," he said.

Angela Speller, who has her life savings in ABCPs at Canaccord, said she has not received a response from Canaccord to her complaint earlier this month.
"[But] I would like the entire sum of money," Speller said. "After all I didn't put my money in anything that was risky. I was told it was triple A."
Magic Words

Ron Lawley used the magic words: "T-Bills". If it can be proven that is what he said, his broker should be in deep trouble for not doing what was stated. The question is whether or not it can be proven what Lawley said. Nonetheless, I suspect Lawley will be believed unless a phone recording proves otherwise.

On the other hand, Angela Speller used the wrong words: "AAA". There is no guarantee on "AAA" and that may prove to be a very expensive lesson depending on what Canaccord decides to do with "small investors".

85% Recovery Rate Doubtful

Odds of an 85% recovery rate that was mentioned earlier are extremely doubtful. Besides, 85% "recovery" some 7-9 years down the road in 2015-2017 is simply not 85% recovery no matter how much whitewashing is done.

It will be interesting to see just what is offered to small investors and in what timeframes. To secure the necessary votes to unfreeze this mess some concessions do appear likely for "small" investors. "Small" may simply mean just small enough to secure enough votes to get this deal passed. Anyone too big, is likely going to be very unhappy with the result.

No matter what the offer, this setup seems more like a No Win Situation or a Hobson's Choice (accepting the offer or eventually getting nothing after years of legal fees), than it does a Catch 22.

Thanks to Deb Wot, a teacher in the Canadian Northwest Territories, for helping compile links used in this article. Deb's blog is Making Sense of my World.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here
To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
 
Copyright 2010 Camera Dashboard. All rights reserved.
Themes by Ex Templates Blogger Templates l Home Recordings l Studio Rekaman